Much of the discussion on the FM website concerns how to reform America, putting ourselves back on track — not just for survival, but also prosperity. The fiercest debate concerns the most important step. The first step. This post gives what is the definitive answer.
Contents
- Recognition that we have a problem is the first step
- Recognition that we are the problem is the first step
- Implications of this insight
- Prior use of this analogy
- A note about insanity from Psychology Today
- For more information from the FM site, and an Afterword
(1) The first step is recognition that we have a problem
My proposals all concern some form of recognition. Looking in the mirror to see what we have become. Diagnosis of our problems. Taking responsibility for ourselves, our problems.
- Obama describes the first step to America’s renewal, 8 August 2008
- Let’s look at America in the mirror, the first step to reform, 14 August 2008
- Fixing American: taking responsibility is the first step, 17 August 2008
- The first step on the road to America’s reform, 29 May 2009
- Another look in the mirror at America, 19 November 2009
I was wrong. We’re beyond the point where such mild remedies are even relevant.
(2) The first step is recognition that we are the problem
In finance, in war, in politics — in so many vital areas we have a pattern of repeated behavior — despite repeated failure. The diagnosis is obvious to those who treat such behavioral disorders.
Insanity is repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results.
The source of this brutal insight is not an ancient Chinese proverb, Benjamin Franklin, or Albert Einstein. Those fake sources serve to conceal the nature of this problem.
It comes from the people of Alcoholics Anonymous, its origin lost in the past. I have traced it back to Step 2: A Promise of Hope by James Jensen, a pamphlet published by the Hazelden Foundation (1980). Available here at Google Books.
Jensen expands upon this in the chapter The twelve steps of Alcoholics Anonymous (1993). The resemblance to our America should appear obvious to us all. From Google Books:
The dictionary defines insanity as “inability to manage one’s own affairs and perform one’s social duties … without recognition of one’s own illness.” The first part of the definition certainly applies to those of us who have just admitted that our lives had become unmanageable. Assuming this is our first walk through the Steps, we have not as yet proceeded to the searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves suggested in Step Four; thus, we probably do not recognize the full dimension of our illness. It is very likely that we’re not looking beyond our drinking or drug abuse at this point and are still denying or minimizing the seriousness of the problem. We still be blaming circumstances or other people for our drinking or using rather than accepting the responsibility for our own behavior.
It is also likely that we do not recognize the scope of our dependence. For example, many of us learned to depend on a variety of behaviors to help us cope with or run from the unpleasant realities of life long before we learned to depend on alcohol or other drugs for the same purpose. it is even possible that we have some very common and typical characteristics or personality traits relating to our dependency.
The late Dr. Harry Tiebout, who worked with alcoholics and was a strong supporter of AA for 30 years, defined us as “defiant individualists.” The Big Book {of AA} identifies us as selfish and self-centered, driven by a hundred forms of fear, self-delusion, self-seeking, and self-pity. So our illness is much more serious than we recognize it to be and, if not arrested, can be deadly. But it does not have to mean that we are candidates for psychiatric care.
Another aspect of our insanity is our distorted self-image. Somehow, each of us has come to think of our problem as being so unique that what will work for others will not work for us. …
Driven by fear and self-delusion — almost my exact words in America’s Most Dangerous Enemy (1 March 2006).
The basic text of Narcotics Anonymous (PDF here) gives another perspective:
Insanity is repeating the same mistakes and expecting different results. Many of us realize when we get to the program that we have gone back time and again to using, even though we knew that we were destroying our lives. Insanity is using drugs day after day knowing that only physical and mental destruction comes when we use.
Compulsive foreign borrowing. incessant wars. Electing obviously unqualified candidates to office (e.g., Carter, Obama, Sonny Bono, Fred Thompson, Arnold The Terminator). One needs no advanced degrees to see these are self-destructive behaviors.
(3) Implications of this insight
(1) The most serious problem we face is not an external shockwave. Attack by Islamo-whatevers, global warming, peak oil, etc.
(2) As Pogo said “We have met the enemy and he is us.” (from a 1970 poster made for the first Earth Day by Walt Kelly). Our behavior puts at us risk, a danger worse than any other enemy. That makes sense. Given our wealth and power, no external enemy has the capacity to destroy us.
(3) Self-destructive behavior continues until one either has a change of spirit — or hits bottom. Which path will we choose?
(4) Prior use of this analogy
This is hardly a unique or new insights. For example, see this from The coming generational storm: what you need to know about America’s by Laurence J. Kotlikoff and Scott Burns — Excerpt:
Fiscal and generationally, our government is driving blind. Sound insane? Sure sounds that way to us, but the check we went to Google and typed in “the definition of insanity …
Unfortunately, the political junkies running the country are in denial and see no need to attend recovery meetings. Each session of Congress and each election leads to the same thing: talk and more talk about reforming Social Security and Medicare, but ends with no action, a concerted effort to make maters worse, or half-baked reforms that do nothing to fix the true scale of the problem.
(5) A note about insanity from Psychology Today
Let’s not get carried away by this terminology. A nation is not a person and cannot go insane (although NAZI Germany might be a counter-example). This is a metaphor.
For the overly literal among you, all your objections appear in this article: “The Definition of Insanity is…“, Ryan Howes, blog of Psychology Today, 27 July 2009 — “Perseverance vs. Perseveration.”
(6a) For more information
To read other articles about these things, see the following:
- About America – how can we reform it?
- About America’s national defense strategy and machinery
- Good news about America, a collection of articles!
Reference pages about other topics appear on the right side menu bar, including About the FM website page. Here are some recent posts about solutions:
- Diagnosing the Eagle, Chapter III – reclaiming the Constitution, 3 January 2008
- Obama might be the shaman that America needs, 17 July 2008
- Obama describes the first step to America’s renewal, 8 August 2008
- Fixing America: shall we choose elections, revolt, or passivity?, 16 August 2008
- Fixing American: taking responsibility is the first step, 17 August 2008
- Fixing America: the choices are elections, revolt, or passivity, 18 August 2008
- What happens next? Advice for the new President, part one., 17 October 2008
- What to do? Advice for the new President, part two., 18 October 2008
- Are the new “tea party” protests a grass roots rebellion or agitprop?, 1 March 2009
- How to stage effective protests in the 21st century, 21 April 2009
- The first step on the road to America’s reform, 29 May 2009
- Correction to my previous posts – not all citizen activism is good…, 16 October 2009