Site icon Fabius Maximus website

The Berkeley riot was a scene from Lord of the Flies, not a political event

Summary: By now the true nature of the Berkeley protests should be obvious. But it’s not, obscured by lies from both sides and the usual flood of hysterical commentary from the media. This post gives the short version. But the future is more important. What the Berkeley riot lacked shows a path to a better future for America.

Political protests in America: Left and Right fighting to control a trash can.

Pointless fighting at Berkeley riot on 15 April 2017. By Stephen Lam, Reuters.

Different camera angles on the Berkeley riot

Raw ABC News video of the 15 April riot in Berkeley.  See another video at the end of the post.

Another perspective on this riot, showing the Left and Right in a street protests.

Available at Amazon.

Another perspective on this event

On the streets of Berkeley we saw children acting out, acting with the purposeless violence of young men lacking adult supervision. It’s Lord of the Flies.

Of course, that is only the first stage of the process. The Berkeley street riot was not between two gangs, like the Jets and Sharks, the Crips and the Bloods. It was two inchoate groups.

The likely next step is their coalescence into real and antagonistic gangs — capable of more serious violence. Young men do this automatically, as Muzafer Sherif showed in his famous — and disturbing — “Robbers Cave experiment (see the book).

All this can produce is political violence, not political solutions.

What is happening?

The people at Berkeley pretend to be doing politics. Just like people chanting “Hitler Hitler Hitler” to Bush Jr. And those chanting “Hitler Hitler Hitler” to Obama (“Obamacare is really I think the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.“). And chanting “Hitler Hitler Hitler” to Trump. Neither are serious political actors. Both are have fun and expressing themselves.

The Berkeley riot was — like the Ferguson riot and the 1992 LA riot, and the countless ones before that — a typical peasants’ protest. People organized to pursue rational political goals, with leaders and plans, do not do these. These protests occur when people — mostly young men — are frustrated with their lives (usually for good reasons) and alienated from society’s political machinery.

Peasants’ protests are welcomed by a society’s ruling elites as a means of releasing accumulated stress — as a safety value vents steam from a boiler. Properly managed — with police knowing how far to let them run — they act to stabilize the existing order. The young men have fun. Their leaders can be identified at an early stage and dealt with. The violence boosts support for the regime.

CIvil Rights March in Summer 1963.

What would worry our ruling elites?

America’s young people and oppressed minorities lack the two factors that would make them effective forces for political change. First, a vision of what they want done. Not just “better”, but what specifically they want change. They need to see an alternative.

Second, they need to want leaders. Occupy, the Tea Party, Antifa, Black Bloc — groups today reflect the desires of their members: they do not want leaders. Leaders are no fun. They create organizations and hierarchies which limit individuals’ ability to express themselves. Our rulers will fear them when these people value political effectiveness more than fun.

Until these changes occur in the minds and hearts of protestors, these riots will generate income for the news media and joy for the 1% — and little else.

Other posts about the Berkeley riot

For More Information

If you liked this post, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter. See all posts about protests, about Reforming America: steps to new politics, and especially these …

Another video of the Lord of the Flies protest at Berkeley on April 15

Exit mobile version