Summary: The monthly employment report provides the opportunity to look at the New America being built on the ruins of the own. While seldom remarked, it clearly appears in the data. Also, we take a moment to reflect on the purpose and operation of the FM website.
“Big industry constantly requires a reserve army of unemployed workers for times of overproduction. The main purpose of the bourgeois in relation to the worker is, of course, to have the commodity labour as cheaply as possible, which is only possible when the supply of this commodity is as large as possible in relation to the demand for it …”
— Marx (1847, unpublished work)
“Taking them as a whole, the general movements of wages are exclusively regulated by the expansion and contraction of the industrial reserve army …”
— Marx, Das Kapital (1867)
One of the goals of the FM website is too provide its readers with a different perspective on events. We do this by presenting information, reporting expert analysis, and the occasional prediction. Hopefully this helps you see our complex and changing world more clearly than relying solely on mainstream sources.
Looking at the economy shows how this works. For the past 3 years I have shown that the widespread claims that the recession had not ended were false. I predicted that forecasts of an imminent return to post-WW2 average growth were likewise false.
The monthly employment reports show this alternative perspective at work in another way. Each month brings a tide of forecasts. Boom! Bust! And analysis of the report is similarly dramatic. That’s how newspapers are sold and website traffic grows. It is, however, quite fallacious. Each month we duly and dully report that nothing has changed. Just more slow growth. As seen in this graph of monthly percent changes in the number of jobs (YoY, NSA). Steady, slow:
As usual, let’s put this in a longer-term context. Job growth has stabilized at an unusually low level. Also note how the business cycle was tamed after 1982. The magic ingredient: rapid debt growth. Being used today, but most aggressively by the Federal government. Without this fiscal stimulus we probably would look like Europe, and there would be fewer stories about America Ascendent.
This is the big story. The breathless analysis monthly commentary in the media mostly discusses noise, which masks the important conclusion: at this rate the US will return to full employment in 4 or 5 years. Unfortunately the normal business cycle will likely give us another recession by then (we’re now in the 5th year of the expansion). By the way, the third quarter is tracking for only 1.5% gdp growth — with estimates coming down, but still looking too high.
But is this slow job growth a bug or a feature? Marx was clearly wrong about the first wave of the industrial revolution. He might have the last laugh, however. Look at the trend in wages as a share of total domestic income (NSA).
Crush unions, cuts taxes on business, fragment work into jobs that require minimal skills, fragment jobs into a largely part-time contingent workforce, expand training so that there is a surplus to demand, increase immigration, outsource work to other nations to create internal competition — and the profits will flow. This is the New America being built by large corporations from McDonald’s to Amazon.
Training too many skilled people is an important part of the game. Tight controls on the supply of doctors shows the effect of too-small supply. The relatively low wages of engineers and scientists shows how corporations run the supply-demand equation for their benefit: “The STEM Crisis Is a Myth“, Robert N. Charette, IEEE Spectrum, 30 August 2013 — “Forget the dire predictions of a looming shortfall of scientists, technologists, engineers, and mathematician.” A reliable formula for higher profits: training more than there are jobs AND import more workers from other nations.
Other posts looking at the economy today
- The greatest monetary experiment, ever, 20 June 2013
- Is there a recession looming in our future? Let’s review the evidence., 2 August 2013
- How strong is the US economy? Let’s look at drivers of growth!, 5 August 2013
- Status report on the US economy: where we are, where we’re going, 27 August 2013
- Look at the economy to see why today’s jobs report is so important!, 6 September 2013
For more information about the US economy
- A certain casualty of the recession: the US Government’s solvency, 25 November 2008
- Beginning of the end of the Republic’s solvency. Soon come the first steps to a reformed regime – or a new regime., 14 August 2009
- The Robot Revolution arrives, and the world changes, 20 April 2012 — about structural unemployment
- America is rich and powerful because we can borrow. Will this debt build a stronger America?, 5 June 2012
- America’s strength is an illusion created by foolish borrowing, 10 October 2012
3 thoughts on “Let’s reflect on the course of the US economy. Not a pretty picture.”
Good one. Fairly simple and quite obvious.
It is obvious that big industry knows Marx very well and follow its insights. No wonder knowing the same by masses is not good for them, Recomendation from Marx’s analitical work by big industry; scarce money, scarce materials, abundant supply of available labor= profits.
Keyness found the cure for it and for taking the surplus by capitalist owners and for inherent flaw of capitalism; competition reduces profits. Credit expansion causing inflation on fixed rate debt is the cure for capitalism flaws and makes Marx’s prediction incorect. When private credit expansion ceases then government does it.
Credit provides replacement for profit taking so that workers receive what they produced but only if inflation reduces the debt burden. Without wage pull inflation, Marx becomes relevant again.
“It is obvious that big industry knows Marx very well and follow its insights. ”
I’ll take the other side of that bet (speaking with authority, as one who wasted years of college learning Marx’s theories). I am certain that it is another instance of a common phenomenon in history: the discovery and re-discovery of insights.
Titans of business typically have, in my experience, extraordinary narrow knowledge bases.