New climate porn: it forces walruses to jump to their death!

Summary: Polar bears are doing fine, so alarmists need new “poster animals” for climate change. Netflix’s “Our Planet” series nominates walruses, with a distressing film showing walruses jumping to their deaths.

See Attenborough’s climate porn of walruses plunging to their deaths!

It’s fun contrived nonsense.

By Susan Crockford at Polar Bear Science.
Reposted with her generous permission.

A recent Netflix ‘Our Planet’ program with David Attenborough delivered a disturbing message about walruses falling off a cliff to their deaths because of climate change. It is contrived nonsense on par with the bogus National Geographic starving polar bear video of 2017. The walruses shown in this Netflix film were almost certainly driven over the cliff by polar bears during a well-publicized incident in 2017, not because they were “confused by a combination of shrinking ice cover and their own poor eyesight” as said by Cheyenne Macdonald at the Daily Mail. H/t to Charles the Moderator from WUWT.

• “The Disturbing Walrus Scene in Our Planet” by Ed Yong in The Atlantic – “A shocking sequence shows the huge mammals scaling steep cliffs, then falling to their death.”
• “A Netflix Nature Series Says to Viewers: Don’t Like What You See? Do Something About It” by Jennifer Vineyard in the New York Times – “we witness something that shouldn’t be happening — and is only happening now …because of climate change. “
• “David Attenborough’s Our Planet: Walruses plunging to deaths become new symbol of climate change“ by Damian Whitworth at The Times. – “the plight of the walruses is regarded by the producers as the most powerful story they found during four years of filming.”
• “Netflix’s “Our Planet” has made the walrus the new heartbreaking image of climate change” by Adam Epstein at Quartz.
• “‘Watching Our Planet made me cry like a baby’” at RadioTimes.

Falling off cliffs is not a new phenomenon.

Here is video of US Fish and Wildlife officials in 1994 explaining a situation where walruses are falling even without the impetus from polar bears, at Cape Pierce in the southern Bering Sea (a haulout for adult males during the ice-free season). Explanation? Overcrowding (too many walruses)! H/t to Mark Sullivan.

The ‘Our Planet’ film provides no precise details about the time and place of the incident (see here or here), except that these were Pacific walrus “in the Russian Arctic” according to The Times (above). The The Atlantic above confirms that the ‘Our Planet’ footage was filmed in 2017, and that “the sequence includes footage from two separate beaches – one with the 100,000-strong congregation and one with the falls.” This occurred on 19 October 2017 and was reported by the Siberian Times: “Village besieged by polar bears as hundreds of terrorised walruses fall 38 metres to their deaths.“

“The polar bears were attracted by 5,000 walruses that appeared this year at a special protection zone in Chukotka. Many of the frightened flippered marine mammals fell off cliffs at Kozhevnikova Cape as they sought to flee the invaders. Several hundred fell to their deaths, and the polar bears then ate the carcasses. …’Now the walruses are gone, but about 20 polar bears remain practically next to the village,'”

The group of about 20 polar bears, waiting for ice to form so that they could leave the village of Ryrkaypiy, stalked a herd of 5,000 or so walruses. The particular conformation of the region (see photo above) at Kozhevnikova Cape shows how frightened walrus could easily move from the beach (bottom left) to the top of the cliff (top right) along a gentle slope, and then be driven over the edge by fear or misstep. The bears were then able to feed off the many carcasses after the survivors took to the water.

See my blog post from last fall about the situation in Ryrkaypiy. It has a walrus haulout location nearby and the few dozen polar bears from the Chukchi Sea subpopulation that spend the summer on shore waiting for sea ice to reform during the fall present safety problems for the villagers.

Here’s a quote from Gizmodo about the 2017 incident, blaming it on climate change: “Polar Bears Drive Hundreds of Walruses Off Cliff in Siberian Bloodbath.” Bold emphasis added.

“Climate change is having all sorts of bizarre and terrifying consequences in Siberia. Outbreaks of zombie anthrax, massive methane blowouts, But the latest freak incident – in which hundreds of walruses hauled out on a shoreline, before tumbling off a cliff in terror at the sight of approaching polar bears – reminds us how changes can ripple across the food chain, throwing delicate ecological relationships out of whack.

“The incident in question occurred near Ryrkaypiy, a tiny village located on the northern coast of Chukotka bordering the Chukchi Sea. According to a report by the Siberian Times, 5,000 walruses recently hauled out on a shoreline near the village. The walruses were followed by about 20 polar bears, no doubt drawn by the stench of thousands of blubbery, flippered meals.

“The arrival of the bears caused the walruses to panic, and many attempted to flee. Per the Siberian Times, ‘several hundred’ fell to their deaths off the cliffs of the nearby Kozhevnikova Cape. The bears, naturally, went to town on the carcasses.

“’The situation is alarming,’ Viktor Nikiforov, Head of Polar Bear Patrol at World Wildlife Fund Russia, told the Siberian Times in the understatement of the century. “Many [walruses] crashed, falling from a height.”

“Kristin Laidre, a polar bear expert at the University of Washington, told Earther that while she has not heard about walruses falling off cliffs very often, “certainly polar bears will be attracted to any prey on shore during the ice-free season, even if it’s close to a village with people.”

“Mikhail Stishov, Arctic Biodiversity officer for World Wildlife Fund Russia, told Earther that in the last few years ‘it’s been a pretty typical situation with huge haul outs on the shore line (due to ice cover reducing). Ryrkaypiy is one of the regular haul out sites.’

“A handful of other sites along the Russian and Alaskan Chukchi coast have also started playing host to massive groups of walruses, as the nearshore sea ice they use to access shallow water food sources disappears. For the Inupiat village of Point Lay on Alaska’s North Slope, hundreds to thousands of walruses have become a regular late summer spectacle.”

As the above shows, WWF was there to witness the event and provide opinion. A Mikhail Stishov, Arctic Biodiversity officer for World Wildlife Fund Russia and Head of WWF project Polar Bear Patrol, Viktor Nikiforov were there. And who does Attenborough direct distraught viewers to at the end of this particularly disturbing ‘Our Planet’ episode? Why, WWF, who would be only too happy to accept your cash donations.

According to The Times story on the ‘Our Planet episode: “The series has a strong conservation message and the plight of the walruses is regarded by the producers as the most powerful story they found during the four years of filming.” (See The Times review of the series.)

The bottom line.

This “powerful story” is fiction and emotional manipulation at its worst. Even if the footage shown by Attenborough was not the 2017 incident in Ryrkaypiy (or a similar one from another year or similar location), we know that walruses reach the top of cliffs in some locations and might fall if startled by polar bears, people or aircraft overhead, not because they are confused by shrinking sea ice cover. Walrus will not replace polar bears as an icon for global warming because  neither is being harmed by reduced summer sea ice.

Journalists should have asked where and when this footage was shot, but they did not. The media are therefore complicit in perpetuating myths about walrus, sea ice, and polar bears in order to advance an agenda while providing free advertising for Netflix.

Good news about walruses!

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that the Pacific walrus is not being harmed by climate change and are not likely to be harmed within the foreseeable future (details here).

“The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has found that the Pacific walrus does not require protection as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The finding follows a comprehensive review and analysis of the best available scientific information concerning the species, as well as local and traditional ecological knowledge of Alaska Native peoples. …While walruses use sea ice for a variety of activities, including breeding, birthing, resting and avoiding predators, they have shown an ability to adapt to sea ice loss …”

The IUCN Red List (2015) said the Pacific walrus was ‘data deficient‘. Here’s my post on the 2014 summary paper about the walrus haulout phenomenon (report here). My GWPF video is below. See this list of previous walrus posts.

—————————————-

A note from the editor

Dr. Crockford gives a brutal rebuttal to this bit of climate agitprop. But it is trying to stop the rain by catching the drops. After years of careful political work, climate activists have captured many key institutions in America. Now they are using them to bombard us with propaganda. Look at liberal websites such as Naked Capitalism (whose useful daily links I read every morning). Almost every day they mention a scary climate story (sometimes two). Most are exaggerations; some are outright bogus. But there are there every morning, teaching readers that doom is coming unless we take radical action.

These stories seldom mention the massive reports of the IPCC’s working group I (the physical sciences). That would ruin the narrative.

About the author

Susan Crockford is a zoologist with more than 35 years experience, including published work on the Holocene history of Arctic animals. She is an adjunct professor at the University of Victoria, British Columbia (a “non-remunerated professional zooarcheologist associate”) and co-owner of a private consulting company, Pacific Identifications Inc.

See her publications and her website Polar Bear Science.

She has also written a novel, Eaten — a polar bear attack thriller.

For More Information

Ideas! For some shopping ideas, see my recommended books and films at Amazon.

An example of fear-mongering about polar bears: Mother Jones sounds the alarm about global warming! This time about the north pole. Exploiting the polar bear story for political gain!

See mainstream polar bear scientists’ response to Crockford’s work (it’s quite pitiful): A new paper shows why the climate policy debate is broken.

Please like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter. For more information see The keys to understanding climate change and my posts about climate change. Also see all posts about polar bears, the arctic area, and polar sea ice, and especially these with good news about the climate…

1. Twenty stories of good news about polar bears!
2. Are 30 thousand species going extinct every year?
3. Good news about polar bears, thriving as the arctic warms!
4. The IPCC gives us good news about climate change, but we don’t listen.
5. Good news about CO2 emissions. Progress to a better world.
6. A look at the workings of Climate Propaganda Inc.
7. About the corruption of climate science.

See Crockford’s new book!

The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened.
By Susan Crockford (2019).

A fact-rich, logical, and dispassionate book that upsets a key climate change narrative. See my review.

From the publisher …

“The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened explains why the catastrophic decline in polar bear numbers we were promised in 2007 failed to materialize. It’s the story of how and why the polar bear came to be considered ‘Threatened’ with extinction, and tracks its rise and fall as an icon of the global warming movement.

“The book also tells the story of Crockford’s role in bringing that failure to public attention and the backlash against her that ensued – and why, among all others who have attempted to do so previously, she was uniquely positioned to do so. In general, this is a cautionary tale of scientific hubris and of scientific failure, of researchers staking their careers on untested computer simulations and later obfuscating inconvenient facts.

“For the first time, you’ll see a frank and detailed account of attempts by scientists to conceal population growth as numbers rose from an historical low in the 1960s to the astonishing highs that surely must exist after almost 50 years of protection from overhunting. There is also a blunt account of what truly abundant populations of bears mean for the millions of people who live and work in areas of the Arctic inhabited by polar bears.”