Summary: As my family searches for a home in the Heartland, we continue this series of reposts to bring you insights from the fringes of the internet. Where new ideas are born and social change begins.
The Left is senescent, played out and intellectually exhausted. The Democrats have betrayed their core principles, allying with Wall Street, our warmongers, and the Deep State. Now opposition arises on the Left, seeking new perspectives. These might yield new strategies and perhaps even (eventually) a recreation of the progressive – populist alliance that is the only possible path to defeat of the 1%.
High Crimes and Misdemeanors –
Not by Trump but Obama and Democrats
BY Ajamu Baraka at the Black Agenda Report, 25 July 2018.
Reposted with their generous permission.
Increasing evidence emerges that confirms what ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern suggests was a classic off-the-shelve intelligence operation initiated during the last year of Obama’s presidency against the Trump campaign by employees of, and others associated with, the CIA, FBI, and the NS. Yet the public is being counseled to ignore possible proof of state misconduct.
The historic and unprecedented timing of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictmentof twelve Russia military intelligence officers on the eve of Trump’s meeting with Putin, was clearly meant to undercut Trump’s authority. This still did not pique the journalistic curiosity of an ostensibly independent press to at least pretend to question the possible motivation for these indictments at such a specific moment.
Instead of critical questions, Democrats, along with the corporate liberal media, flipped the script and suggested that those questioning the allegations of Russian manipulation of the 2016 U.S. elections, which supposedly included the active or tacit support of the Trump campaign, was ipso-facto evidence of one’s disloyalty to the state — if not also complicit with implementing the Russia inspired conspiracy.
This narrative has been set and is meant to be accepted as veracious and impermeable to challenges. Powerful elements of the ruling class, operating with and through the Democratic party in an attempt to secure maximum electoral success, decided that Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia shall be the primary narrative to be utilized by Democrats — from the increasing phony opposition represented by the Sanders wing of the party, to the neoliberal, buck-dancing members of the Congressional Black Caucus. All are expected to fall in line and do the ruling class’s bidding.
When Trump met with the arch-enemy Vladimir Putin in Helsinki and didn’t declare war on Russia for conspiring against Clinton, charges of treason were splashed across the headlines and editorial pages of the elite press with some of the loudest denunciations coming from Black liberals.
Not being at war with Russia, at least not in the technical sense, was just one of those inconvenient facts that didn’t need to get in the way of the main objective, which was to smear Trump
And while evidence of collusion continues to surface, it’s actually not between Trump and the Russians, rather it’s between intelligence officials in the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign. The latest revelation of this evidence was reported by “John Solomon in, The Hill,” a Washington insider publication. According to Solomon, former FBI attorney Lisa Page gave testimony to the House Judiciary committee that seemed to confirm the partisan intentions of Peter Strzok and other high officials in the agency.
Page was one of the authors of the infamous text messages between her and Peter Strzok (the two were also in a personal relationship at the time) while they both worked together at the FBI. The texts soon became the objective of endless speculation ever since they were revealed last summer. Exchanges shared between Strzok and Page during the 2016 campaign season, appear to point to Strzok’ participation in a vast conspiracy to gather intelligence on the Trump campaign and then to undermine his presidency on the unexpected chance of his election.
“There’s no big there there.”
Two days after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein named Mueller as special counsel, Strzok, who at that time was the lead investigator on the Russia probe texted, “There’s no big there there.”
Peter Strzok wasn’t just a minor bureaucrat with the bureau, as some outlets tried to imply in their coverage of the issue. He was the Chief of the FBI’s Counterespionage Section, and lead investigator into Clinton’s use of a personal server. He then led the FBI’s investigation of Russia interference as the Deputy Assistant Director of Counterintelligence Division until he was replaced in the summer of 2017.
Page confirmed that the no “there there” was in fact the quality of the Russia investigation. This means that a special counsel was appointed even though key FBI officials knew that there wasn’t anything there.
Page’s testimony provides strong confirmation that the decision by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to name Mueller as special counsel, who then brought in Strzok to lead the Russia-gate team, was not an objective, innocent affair. In actuality, it points to criminal use of the government’s counterintelligence capabilities to engage in a partisan manipulation of the electoral process.
Some liberals, and even some radicals, pose questions like, “Even if those officials engaged in questionable activity, why should that be of concern for progressive forces, especially since this presidency represents the forefront of a neo-fascist movement in the U.S?”
There are three interconnected reasons why progressives should be concerned:
First: The normalization of the assault on bourgeois democracy.
If elements of the capitalist class, in coordination with the major intelligence agencies, can successfully conspire to undermine and/or control an individual duly elected by the processes of U.S. democracy, as flawed as it may be, what does it suggest for a strategy that sees the electoral arena as a primary space for advancing progressive candidates and oppositional movements?
The ruling class will go to great depths to maintain power.
The fact that elements of the ruling class are prepared to undermine a member of their own class because that individual represents social forces that the financial and corporatist elite have determined are a threat to their interests must make us question “What would happen if a true radical was able to win high office? We are already seeing the effects as so-called progressives and radicals are aligning with and supporting these elements due to their shared hatred for Trump is still largely a reactionary approach that contains no long-term strategy for building and sustaining actual power.
Second: By aligning politically with the U.S. based transnational ruling class that sees Trump as a threat to their interests, liberals and some left forces have abandoned positions and left them to the radical right, with the objective result of providing support for the very same narrow, racist, U.S.-centric, and proto-fascist forces that liberals and the left claim to be opposed to.
The critique and rejection of NATO, supporting de-escalation of tensions with Russia, exposing hegemony of finance capital, revealing the anti-democratic nature of the European Union, opposing international “trade” agreements like the Trans-Pacific Partnership and trans-Atlantic Investment Partnership, demanding that U.S. forces withdraw from Syria and questioning the role of Saudi Arabia in spreading right-wing Wahhabism throughout the world, are now positions taken up by the right because the imperial left has aligned itself with the agenda of transnational capital and its imperialist objectives in lieu of presenting a people’s agenda.
Third: Consequently, the criticism of Trump’s foreign policies, including approaches on North Korea and Russia by Democrats, is coming from positions to the right of Trump! The result is a political environment in which the possibility of escalating military conflicts with Russia, Iran or even at some point with China, is becoming a more normalized and realistic possibility.
The Clinton News Network (CNN) along with MSNBC, the Washington Post and New York Times are desperately trying to salvage the underlying theme of the assault on the Trump administration: that it’s supposed collusion with foreign sources, specifically the Russians, may have had a significant impact on why Clinton lost the election. And they also hold that any deviation from that declaration by Trump and his administration are just attempts at obstruction of justice.
With the revelations about the role and activities of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, the Comey leak to the press, with the express purpose to create pretext for the appointment of a special counsel, the placing of an FBI informant in the Trump campaign, the role of Andrew McCabe in covering up for his subordinates and leaking classified information to the press, the “primary narrative” of the Democrat party and liberals is starting to unravel.
Abuse of state power is nothing new.
This would not be the first time that powerful unelected elements in the state have moved to manipulate political outcomes based on an agenda that the public had no knowledge of or even to remove a president. People have forgotten or didn’t make the correct connection that the famous source of information that brought down Richard Nixon, Bernstein’s and Woodman’s “deep throat” was Mark Felt, the Associate Director of the FBI!
And like the question raised to Nixon and Watergate then, but will only be raised by the Black Agenda Report today is, “What did Obama know and when did he know it?”
About the author
Ajamu Baraka is the national organizer of the Black Alliance for Peace and was the 2016 candidate for vice president on the Green Party ticket. He is an editor and contributing columnist for the Black Agenda Report and contributing columnist for Counterpunch. His latest publications include “For a national alliance for racial justice and human rights” in Killing Trayvons: An Anthology of American Violence, and contributions to Jackson Rising: The Struggle for Economic Democracy and Black Self-Determination in Jackson, Mississippi.
See his website and his entry at Wikipedia. See his articles at the BAR, especially these.
- Trump’s Neo-Fascism will be Built on Neo-Fascism of Obama and Democrat Party.
- War, Militarism and No Mainstream Opposition: Different Administration, Same Story.
- In Healthcare Battle, Corporations Continue to Win While Public Loses.
- Why Anti-Trumpism Doesn’t Include Anti-War.
- Liberal Totalitarianism and the Trump Diversion.
About the Black Agenda Report
Founded in 2006. Their “About” page gives (impressive) bios of their key staff. See their Twitter feed.
For More Information
Ideas! For shopping ideas see my recommended books and films at Amazon.
If you liked this post, like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter. See all posts about the American Left, the Democratic Party, about ways to reform America’s politics, and especially these…
- Polarization and hot rhetoric conceal two similar political parties. Will we ever notice?
- Our fears are unwarranted. America is in fact well-governed,
- The good news: America’s politics are neither polarized nor dysfunctional. That’s also the bad news.
- The secret reason for America’s white-hot political rhetoric.
- The Awkward Electoral Dance of Liberal Democrats.
- Democrats betray their principles & embrace the Deep State.
A book to help us understand what is happening to America.
Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?
By Thomas Frank.
From the publisher …
“Hailed as ‘the most prescient book’ of the year, Listen, Liberal accurately described what ailed the Democratic Party even before the election of 2016 made their weaknesses obvious. It is the story of how the ‘Party of the People’ detached itself from its historic constituency among average Americans and chose instead to line up with the winners of our new economic order.
“Now with a new afterword, Thomas Frank’s powerful analysis offers the best diagnosis to date of the liberal malady. Drawing on years of research and firsthand reporting, Frank points out that the Democrats have over the last decades increasingly abandoned their traditional goals: expanding opportunity, fighting for social justice, and ensuring that workers get a fair deal. With sardonic wit and lacerating logic, he uncovers the corporate and cultural elitism that have largely eclipsed the party’s old working- and middle-class commitment. And he warns that the Democrats’ only chance of regaining their health and averting a future of ever-increasing inequality is a return to their historic faith.”
10 thoughts on “The time are changing, as the Black Left rebels”
And like the question raised to Nixon and Watergate then, but will only be raised by the Black Agenda Report today is, “What did Obama know and when did he know it?
Good luck, there are more degrees of separation than the Kevin Bacon game there.
“there are more degrees of separation than the Kevin Bacon game there.”
I understand the concept, but do not understand what you’re saying. Can you explain a bit more? Sounds interesting!
Look I just mean there are so many layers of bureaucracy (and interested parties) between Obama and Peter Strzok as to render the question meaningless.
A more interesting question is if the Deep State wanted shot of Trump, why is he still here? Either he is totally clean, and they can’t even fabricate anything decent, or this is just a hit and hope by the dems, and this chump Muller who has gone so far he can’t back out.
After all the money spent on the Deep State, is this the best they got? Or are the afraid of Pence.
Thanks for the explanation!
I think a lot of us have the same questions as you do. As I’ve said in my many posts about RussiaGate, it really does not make sense. Which means that we do not clearly see what’s happening. We are on the surface of Dune watching a moving mound of sand, wondering what’s happening underneath.
Try north Idaho panhandle.
What does that mean?
No person anywhere, regardless of race, creed, color, sex, or anything else, likes being taken for granted. And once they decide that you do take them for granted, they’re going to resent it, and they’re going to leave you sooner or later. And this applies to politics, to marriage, to pretty much every human relationship. In 2016, the Blue Wall came tumbling down because a lot of people who had voted Democratic for long that they might as well have had it in their DNA decided that were being taken for granted while the Party pursued an agenda that didn’t have very much to do with their actual interests.
And getting all of those Blue voters back wouldn’t be as hard as all that, because if you just listen to them, they’ll tell you what it is you need to do. (And it’s not like the Congressional Republicans are going be looking out for the actual interests of those voters, but that’s neither here nor there.)
The point is they took people for granted, and it cost them. They can learn from the mistake, or they can go make it it again and we’ll see how much it costs them this time. Because Blacks may actually figure out that they’re in line to be replaced by the Mexicans anyway., which is why you don’t see many black faces at a DACA rally, but immigration is for another day.
I spoke last night to a friend of mine who went to see William Shatner night before last.,He said he watched The Wrath Of Khan again, and it holds up surprisingly well for a 35 year old science fiction movie. It’s really about how we deal with the past, and Khan keeps it right there. “Sir, we can have anything we want. Why must me pursue Donald Trump over Russiagate?”
“He tasks me. He tasks me, and I shall have him..”
I think reader might find this interesting and in a similar light.
Thanks for posting. That looks interesting!