Summary: Today’s post reviews Mike Lofgren’s important new book about The Deep State, the ruling center of the New America. Lofgren’s entertaining but scary book sketches out this institution and how it works. Here’s an explanation of why you should read the book, and its two big limitations.
by Mike Lofgren (2016)
Mike Lofgren has written the definitive account of the Deep State, the “hybrid association of key elements of government and pats of top-level finance and industry that is effectively able to govern the United States with only limited reference to the consent of the governed.”
His has the experience to do so after 28 years as senior budget and national security expert with the Republican staff in Congress. It gives him technical knowledge plus a wealth of observations and vignettes, which he weavers into an entertaining narrative (see the Forward).
The Deep State is the hidden connecting thread to the news in America. It explains the government’s operations run with indifference to their stated goals, its leaders’ unconcern with failure, and the inability of citizens to affect its policies. The quiet growth of the Deep State is the story of modern America’s history.
“Our venerable institutions of government have outwardly remained the same, but they have grown more and more resistant to the popular will as they have become hardwired into a corporate and private influence network with almost unlimited cash to enforce its will.”
Lofgren explains the origins and operations of the Deep State, how it has shaped Washington to its needs and sent its tentacles throughout the American power structure. After reading this book you’ll see the news with a different perspective. It should be required reading for every college student.
Now for the critical part of the review. He goes too far in the middle of the book, almost a list of everything wrong with America — with the Deep State the master explanation. He sometimes conflates the Deep State with conservative forces, when its strength comes from its bipartisan support (everybody loves the F-35, and few are more hawkish than Liberals explaining our Responsibility to Protect).
But these are minor points in a brilliant, thoroughly researched, and well-written book. My disagreements concern two subjects about which we can only speculate.